Skip to Main Content
Talk Intermediate MIT License

Do LLMs dream of electric bugs

Proposal status is Rejected
Session Description

This talk deals with how we can take the paradigms of classical computing - and explore how agents are nothing but structured programs with semantic operators replacing logical ones. The way they work, the way we build guardrails everything else remains exactly the same.

This talk explores how indexing memories and fetching them is very similar to how we streamline operating a database, how spawning sub-agents is a distant cousin of dynamic programming, and how instead of simple if-else conditional blocks, we have classifiers, and how “thinking” is essentially letting the models do iterative loops on their responses.

Key Takeaways

Agents are but simple programs.
Anyone can write their own custom agent ⎯ the key issues in these pipelines are the auxiliary parts : auth, translating media to formats the agent can understand, keeping it simple, not letting context rot creep in.

References

Session Categories

Engineering practice - productivity, debugging
Talk License: MIT License

Which track are you applying for?

Compilers, Programming Languages and Systems

Speakers

Shuvam Manna
Shuvam Manna Founding Designer | SigNoz

I make things on the internet — digital toys, generative art, small experiments in new media that no one asked for but I could not not make. It's hard to call myself just a “software designer,” lest I reduce the strange, unnecessary, overly-obsessed things I keep making. Most of my practice has been solitary, somewhere between tinkering and spiralling—interfaces, tiny tools, odd games, new media experiments that I treat with an almost unreasonable seriousness. I insist, perhaps annoyingly, that playful things deserve rigour too.

Much of my work circles around systems—how we see them, poke them, bend them, or get lost inside them. I keep building small worlds, collecting fragments with a camera, rehearsing moods on a violin, trying to make sense of invisible structures by making them a little more tangible, a little more strange. Recently I’ve been thinking this: every interface is a belief system pretending to be neutral. It sounds dramatic — maybe it is — but I can’t seem to stop believing it.