LLMs can sound smart—but making them think smart is a different story. At my startup, we’re working in domains like semiconductors and electrical systems where users need help selecting highly complex, technical products from catalogs and datasheets. We wanted to build an LLM system that doesn’t just guess, but reasons like an expert.
Turns out, treating LLMs like black boxes gets you black-box results. So we engineered a controlled system: a multi-step reasoning pipeline that translates ambiguous human input into structured, machine-usable filters. Along the way, we learned how to guide the model with prompt engineering, intermediate representations, and feedback loops—so it asks clarifying questions, stays grounded, and delivers useful output.
This talk shares how we did it using Claude, GPT, LangChain, RAG, Python, and prompt chaining strategies—with lessons you can apply to any real-world AI product.
Why one-shot prompts fail in reasoning-heavy, high-ambiguity domains.
How we used LangChain to build a modular prompt pipeline, with each step focused on one cognitive task.
Translating human queries into precise filters using a custom LLM filter parser.
Techniques that worked: persona definition, grounding with examples, output schemas, and broad-scoped prompting.
Why intermediate steps matter: chaining LLM outputs across controlled interfaces.
How we designed LLMs to ask clarifying questions and interact more like a product expert, not just a chatbot.
Practical debugging tips for when “the model gods don’t listen.”
I don't see a significant FOSS angle here for this be an IndiaFOSS talk. Please go through the proposal guidelines - https://forum.fossunited.org/t/talk-proposal-guidelines-for-a-foss-conference-meetup/1923
Seems not suitable for a FOSS Conference
Agreed with other reviewers, this maybe good enough for an AI focused conference but doesnt work well with IndiaFOSS.
Not suitable for this venue.
The reviewers rejected your proposal because it lacked a clear and significant FOSS angle. The feedback indicated that while the topic is technically interesting, it did not align with the core mission and focus of the conference. For future submissions, we highly recommend that you review the proposal guidelines and ensure that your talk explicitly connects to open-source software, projects, or communities.