Brief Description
NVIDIA’s proprietary CUDA software, architecture, and programming platform has become the de facto standard for developing and running AI workloads on GPUs, creating a significant moat that entrenches NVIDIA’s dominance in AI hardware. As AI becomes an increasingly critical technology, this raises concerns around vendor lock-in, reduction in competition, and troubling geopolitical implications for countries seeking to build resiliency for their nascent AI industries. Efforts to create open-source translation layers (such as ZLUDA) or drop-in replacements like AMD’s ROCm have either been stymied or haven’t found purchase.
Discussion Points
The technical and ecosystem advantages that have made CUDA so dominant, and why is this a cause of concern for industry and nation-states alike?
What are the prospects and limitations of open source alternatives like ROCm, ZLUDA, and OpenCL.
Building the “CUDA killer”: What would it take to create an open-source ecosystem that rivals CUDA?
Can policy interventions help balance this need for openness with incentives for innovation in an extremely fast-paced field like AI?
Should governments, therefore, help build and champion an “open” AI technology stack?